Traditional villages- between protection and development
In a recent interview, Xu Pengyuan, a reporter for China News Weekly, shared insights on the complexities surrounding the preservation of traditional villages in China, as featured in the magazine’s October 14, 2024, issue. Over the past few years, the publication has extensively covered ancient architecture, highlighting this invaluable historical heritage. While there are various challenges in protecting and developing these structures, they have increasingly garnered attention. However, Xu noted that the situation is quite different when it comes to traditional villages.
Upon delving deeper into this topic, Xu discovered that these rural communities, often unnoticed, possess a subtle charm that distinguishes them from more renowned historical sites. He emphasized that the cultural value of villages encompasses more than just their architecture; it includes their production methods, lifestyles, and local customs. This broad scope makes it difficult for any single academic discipline to comprehensively study and protect these areas, and there is a lack of dedicated frameworks for traditional village studies.
A critical point of discussion was the living aspect of these villages. Unlike ancient buildings whose historical purposes have long been fulfilled, traditional villages are thriving communities that serve as homes for countless people. Therefore, protecting such areas requires a balanced approach that considers the livelihoods of those who reside there. Yet, this is not without its challenges, as the desire for a better quality of life often leads to conflicts between development and preservation.
Xu also highlighted the complexities surrounding these traditional villages. In the past decade, initiatives like the “China Traditional Village Directory” have initiated government efforts toward preservation, but he believes this is merely the beginning, with the current state and future outlook remaining discouraging.
During a recent trip to Hong Kong, Xu ventured into a rural area far from the bustling city, drawing parallels to the mainland. Just like in other regions, the countryside faced its own issues, such as the decline of traditional industries and the exodus of younger generations. In Tai O, known as the “Venice of Hong Kong,” Xu observed many abandoned stilt houses and elderly residents living in solitude. However, the village still pulsates with life; its ancient temple enjoys vibrant activity, worshippers gather in the church, and children’s laughter fills the air. The community sustains itself through tourism, managing to retain its authenticity without morphing into a superficial attraction. The rustic corners and old houses still stand, augmented by essential repairs, presenting an unfiltered image of age—much like an elderly person whose wrinkles tell stories of time, evoking a unique beauty that is both worn and wise.
As the interview concluded, it became clear that the path ahead for traditional villages is fraught with challenges, but with thoughtful engagement and sustainable practices, there is hope for their preservation.
